Do You Want Fries With That?
Don’t you hate it when you go to a burger joint, place your order and maybe even say, “that’s all,” only to be met with the infamous question:
“Do you want fries with that?”
After hearing about be-a-magpie from Grant Griffiths on Wednesday night, I’m wondering if my twitter stream will soon become inundated with similar annoying messages.
In Theory
Here’s how it works. A twitter user signs up to allow companies to advertise products/services in the user’s twitter stream. Twitter user gets paid based on some formula. Power users have the potential to make big bucks. I’m not a power user and supposedly, even I could generate as much as $3K a month. That’s a lot of shoes!
Here’s why I don’t think it will work:
- Twitter is about conversation, first and foremost, not about push advertising.
- Be-a-magpie turns twitter users into “that guy.” Don’t be him.
- People who get turned off by magpies can choose to block the person.
Would be-a-magpie be more palatable if it allowed:
- Greater user control of ad frequency? What is the least allowable amount? Daily might be tolerable.
- User ability to schedule ad times? Scheduling magpie tweets late at night or on weekends when there is less business use might be less offensive to some followers.
- User choice to accept or deny certain ads based on content or personal integrity?
In the end, followers still have the ability to block people. I’m wondering if most people agree with Lucretia Pruitt? I also wonder how many users who sign up to be-a-magpie will get blocked early on, and loose their following.
Tweets will include the hashtag #magpie and as far as I can tell, will also include short promo blurb and a link. Maybe magpie could be less obtrusive if the tweets were something like, “I love Coca Cola!” At least then we might consider the tweet to be genuine consumer passion.
What do you think about all of this? Isn’t it a bit like being invited to a pool party and then peeing in the hosts pool? Or is it truly an entrepreneurial opportunity that one day will become twitter mainstream? After all, one burger joint started the whole, “Do you want fries with that?” thing in the first place and people are still using the phrase today. It’s still annoying, but I don’t think people ever stopped buying burgers because of it.
Creative Commons photo on Flickr by Old Shoe Woman.


November 20th, 2008 at 1:55 am
At least when you go to a burger joint and they ask you if you want fries, you’re the one that went to the burger joint. Magpie would be like if you were walking around with your friends, and one of your friends that’s allergic to potatoes said “Let’s go get some fries!” every five minutes.
http://thefutureofads.com/2008/11/03/magpie-tries-to-make-twitter-an-ad-network-fails/
November 20th, 2008 at 5:38 am
A Great Big No #IDon’tLikeIt here. I think that it is cool that folks who are big hitters could get paid but I’m sure I’d unfollow because of a bunch of advertising. If I was a big hitter I don’t think I would do it. Conversation and relationships mean much more to me than a few xtra bucks.
November 20th, 2008 at 5:45 am
I think that this would make me stop following others who participated.
Due to the low cost for the advertiser I am sure this would be loaded with ads for viagra, video poker and you won a free iPhone.
I know that when my circle of twitter recommends a product or service there is a level of trust. I think this would be a violation of trust and really end up being excess noise. That being said.. Twitter itself on the other hand if they wanted subsidize their free service operating costs with a mandatory Twitter Corporate follow that tossed an ad here and there in our streams would be something I would support.
November 20th, 2008 at 6:35 am
Hi Cheryl,
I agree that “Twitter is about conversation, first and foremost, not about push advertising.”
I’ve only been using Twitter for about 3 weeks, but I prefer to follow people who have some conversation going, than people who push a product without first engaging me.
I have built my business on trust and word of mouth referrals. I see that totally different from the #magpie concept.
November 20th, 2008 at 7:12 am
Great comments – some funny (Cory). No one weighing in yet on the “yes.”
Christopher – interesting idea for Twitter to monetize. Wonder what sort of push back they’d get if they tried it.
btw, only one of the people I’m following is trying it. Through search.twitter.com (htt://www.summize.com) I’ve seen others who have signed up. Check out #magpie to see what’s being offered up.
November 20th, 2008 at 9:15 am
Here’s the thing about Twitter right now. And I must admit, all I have is my own experience to use anecdotally here, and my own selection of followees (?). No matter what your use of it, you can’t help but follow a lot of marketing type folk. By injecting marketing tweets into the stream, you’re forcing your followers to weigh their personal annoyance against a general desire to support the trade, and by extension a fellow practitioner. I think this might be an even bigger imposition than for a casual user who’s just come over from Facebook.
November 20th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Sort of like, can’t throw a stick in twitter without hitting at least one marketing type? ;-)
November 26th, 2008 at 12:00 am
I think companies should create their own twitter profile to post news/tips and information on their product as coming from them.
Then, they should find people who like/use their product and have posted positively about it, and ask if they’ll be a twitter spokesperson.
They’d publicly welcome them as a spokesperson and that person would announce that they’re promoting that product. The # of tweets over a given period would be arranged by them, but I would expect no more than once/day.
If there was a product I loved and used, I’d be glad to talk about it. But it would have to be something I believe in.