I’m with you and Peter on having a sense of humor about this all. And very cool, the coverage you’re getting, Cheryl! Well-deserved, and great work exposing this and really helping to make so many aware of what “could” happen…

Hi Cheryl,

- Thanks for the email. I can understand why your original post generated an avalanche of responses.

- You have a much more generous sense of humor than I. I would have been ticked – very.

- AIR, that original ad was not in violation of FB’s Terms at the time. It seemed to be quite sanctioned. I could be wrong.

- I have zero trust for FB regarding privacy. It’s a closely-held private company. After over a year with them, without going within a country mile of being a spammer, they still require “verifying” my account if I am to leave comments without clearing the Capcha obstacle each time. And to verify, they want the one thing they can’t easily get by other means – my cell phone #. Land line won’t do. I find it impossible to believe that has anything to do with me being a potential spammer.

I do not trust FB.

Thanks, and be blessed,
p.